WASHINGTON – Last night, the House Agriculture Committee
passed its version of the 2013 Farm Bill.
Consideration by the House panel comes just a day after the
Senate Nutrition and Forestry Committee approved its version of the Farm Bill. Unlike the
Senate bill, the House version does
not contain a provision that NACS vehemently opposes, which would grant the
Department of Agriculture (USDA) full discretion to prevent convenience stores
from accepting Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits
(formerly known as food stamps) if they have excessive sales of alcohol,
tobacco or hot food. The House bill does achieve $20 billion in savings through
cuts to SNAP, which Democrats strongly opposed but could not garner enough
votes to overturn.
The Senate’s provision is similar to language in last year’s
Farm Bill (which was ultimately not enacted into law) that would have prohibited any food retailer from
participating in the SNAP program if 45% or more of the retailer’s revenue is
derived from the combined sales of hot food, alcohol and tobacco. NACS opposes any
language that would give the USDA the authority to arbitrarily prevent stores
that otherwise meet all of SNAP’s eligibility criteria from participating in
the program — simply because USDA bureaucrats do not approve of other lawful
activities in which the retailers participate.
NACS has been diligently educating members of Congress and
their staff in both the House and Senate about how essential the SNAP program
is to convenience stores and their less affluent customers. This is
particularly true in rural communities where economically challenged Americans
have few places to shop for food, and urban communities where few food stores
are open late at night.
House Republican Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) is
suggesting that he will bring the 2013 Farm Bill to the House Floor “sometime
this summer.” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has expressed a desire
to bring the 2013 Farm Bill to the Senate floor quickly. If the two bills pass their respective
chambers, the differences in language will be ironed out in a conference
committee.