Why Obama’s Tobacco Tax Plan Shouldn’t Pass

The president’s budget proposal contains a hike in tobacco taxes to pay for expanded preschool education.

April 17, 2013

WASHINGTON – Why is increasing the tobacco taxes to fund more preschool education a bad idea? Writer Jacob Grier outlines four reasons in The Atlantic:

1.  Tobacco taxes are regressive. The financial burden of higher tobacco taxes will hurt those with lower incomes the most. “A widely reported study of American smokers surveyed from 2010 to 2011 found that smokers making less than $30,000 per year spend 14% of their income on cigarettes. In New York, home to the highest cigarette taxes in the country, cigarettes consume nearly a quarter of their income. By comparison, smokers earning more than $60,000 per year spend just 2% of their income on cigarettes,” Grier pointed out. The president’s budget would raise the federal tax on cigarettes to $1.95 per pack, nearly double its current $1.01 per pack.

2.  Smokers already pay their way. Those who use tobacco pay more in excise taxes and also receive fewer services as they grow older because they usually, well, die younger. “Research at the time of the Master Settlement Agreement showed that smokers were already covering at least a significant portion of their external costs, and tobacco taxes have gone up substantially since then,” wrote Grier. 

3.  Pipes and cigars are already under threat. Obama’s proposal would close the gap between cigarette taxes and taxes on other tobacco products. “The new taxes proposed by Obama would increase rates for cigars and end the disparity between pipe tobacco and roll-your-own by taxing both products at a high rate. But at what cost? The premium tobacco business is already beleaguered by ever more expansive smoking bans, state and local taxes, and the looming threat of costly and inefficient regulation by the FDA. It's a safe bet that Marlboro will still be around a few years from now, but premium cigars and pipe blends may not fare nearly as well,” Grier said.

4.  Broadly beneficial programs should be funded by broadly imposed taxes. While the president’s suggestion is politically correct, it’s not the right thing to do. “According to the Centers for Disease Control, states will collect $25.7 billion from tobacco taxes and legal settlements this year. Less than 2% of this will go toward tobacco-control programs,” wrote Grier.

NACS is reviewing the president’s budget and will provide an analysis should his plan come before Congress for a vote.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement